Conversion of biomass into electricity
Historically one of the earliest alternatives to fossil
fuels is a wood fired boiler producing steam which powers an engine driving a
generator. This, unfortunately is about the only advantage. But the steam power
has all the disadvantages of an engine/generator and even several more. The wood
must be chopped and carried, cured, split, and fed, just as for any wood stove.
Ashes must be handled and hauled. The entire installation requires constant
control while it is running. Due to compounds in some of the feedstocks,
“slagging and fouling” can occur. Slagging is accumulation of solid
residues on parts of the combustion system. Fouling is simply the
accumulation of liquid or semi-liquid residue. This is an important aspect of
plant operation and operators need to understand how biomass differs from more
commonly used fuels.
GASIFICATION
Usually, electricity from biomass is produced via the condensing steam
turbine, in which the biomass is burned in a boiler to produce steam’ which is
expanded through a turbine driving a generator. The technology is
well-established, robust and can accept a wide variety of feedstocks. However,
it has a relatively high unit-capital cost and low operating efficiency with
little prospect of improving either significantly in the future. There is also
the inherent danger in steam. Steam occupies about 1200 times the volume of
water at atmospheric pressure (known as “gage” pressure). Producing steam
requires heating water to above boiling temperature under pressure. Water boils
at 100° C at sea level. By pressurizing the boiler it is possible to raise the
boiling temperature of water much higher. Elevating steam temperature has to be
done to use the generated steam for any useful work otherwise the steam would
condense in the supply lines or inside the cylinder of the steam engine
itself. Gasification is the newest method to generate electricity
from biomass. Instead of simply burning the fuel, gasification captures
about 65-70% of the energy in solid fuel by converting it first into combustible
gases. This gas is then burned as natural gas is, to create electricity,
fuel a vehicle, in industrial applications, or converted to synfuels-synthetic
fuels. Since this is the latest technology, it is still under
development. A promising alternative is the gas turbine fuelled by
gas produced from biomass by means of thermochemical decomposition in an
atmosphere that has a restricted supply of air. Gas turbines have lower
unit-capital costs, can be considerably more efficient and have good prospects
for improvements of both parameters.
Biomass gasification systems
generally have four principal components:
(a) Fuel preparation, handling and feed system;
(b) Gasification reactor vessel;
(c) Gas cleaning, cooling and mixing system;
(d) Energy conversion system (e.g.,
internal-combustion engine with generator or pump set, or gas burner coupled to
a boiler and kiln).
When gas is used in an internal-combustion engine for electricity
production (power gasifiers), it usually requires elaborate gas cleaning,
cooling and mixing systems with strict quality and reactor design criteria
making the technology quite complicated. Therefore, “Power gasifiers world-wide
have had a historical record of sensitivity to changes in fuel characteristics,
technical hitches, manpower capabilities and environmental conditions”.
Gasifiers used simply for heat generation do not have such complex
requirements and are, therefore, easier to design and operate, less costly and
more energy- efficient.. All types of gasifiers require feedstocks with low
moisture and volatile contents. Therefore, good quality charcoal is generally
best, although it requires a separate production facility and gives a lower
overall efficiency.
In the simplest, open-cycle gas turbine the hot exhaust of the
turbine, is discharged directly to the atmosphere. Alternatively, it can be used
to produce steam in a heat recovery steam generator. The steam can then be used
for heating in a cogeneration system; for injecting back into the gas turbine,
thus improving power output and generating efficiency known as a steam-injected
gas turbine (STIG) cycle; or for expanding through a steam turbine to boost
power output and efficiency - a gas turbine/steam turbine combined cycle (GTCC)
(Williams & Larson, 1992). While natural gas is the preferred fuel, limited
future supplies have stimulated the expenditure of millions of dollars in
research and development efforts on the thermo-chemical gasification of coal as
a gas-turbine feedstock. Much of the work on coal-gasifier/gas-turbine systems
is directly relevant to biomass integrated gasifier/gas turbines (BlG/GTs).
Biomass is easier to gasify than coal and has a very low sulphur content. Also,
BIG/GT technologies for cogeneration or stand-alone power applications have the
promise of being able to produce electricity at a lower cost in many instances
than most alternatives, including large centralized, coal-fired, steam-electric
power plants with flue gas desulphurization, nuclear power plants, and
hydroelectric power plants. Gasifiers using wood and charcoal (the
only fuel adequately proved so far) are again becoming commercially available,
and research is being carried out on ways of gasifying other biomass fuels (such
as residues) in some parts of the world. Problems to overcome include the
sensitivity of power gasifiers to changes in fuel characteristics, technical
problems and environmental conditions. Capital costs can still sometimes be
limiting, but can be reduced considerably if systems are manufactured locally or
use local materials. For example, a ferrocement gasifier developed at the Asian
institute of Technology in Bangkok had a capital cost reduced by a factor of
ten. For developing countries, the sugarcane industries that produce sugar and
fuel ethanol are promising targets for near-term applications of BIG/GT
technologies.
Gasification has been the focus of attention in India because of its
potential for large scale commercialization. Biomass gasification technology
could meet a variety of energy needs, particularly in the agricultural and rural
sectors. A detailed micro- and macroanalysis by Jain (1989) showed that the
overall potential in terms of installed capacity could be as large as 10,000 to
20,000 MW by the year 2000, consisting of small-scale decentralized
installations for irrigation pumping and village electrification, as well as
captive industrial power generation and grid fed power from energy plantations.
This results from a combination of favourable parameters in India which includes
political commitment, prevailing power shortages and high costs, potential for
specific applications such as irrigation pumping and rural electrification, and
the existence of an infrastructure and technological base. Nonetheless,
considerable efforts are still needed for large- scale commercialization.
CO-FIRING
Co-firing of biofuels (e.g. gasified wood) and coal seems to be the way
how to reduce emissions from coal firing power plants in many countries. In 1999
a new co-firing system - biomass and coal - started its operation in Zeltweg
(Austria). A 10 MW biomass gasification unit was installed in combination with
an existing coal fired power station. The gasifier needs 16 m3 woody biomass
(chips and bark) per hour. The calorific value of the gas ranges between 2,5 - 5
MJ/Nm3. The project named “Biococomb” is an EU demonstration project. It was
realised by the “Verbund” company together with several other companies from
Italy, Belgium, Germany and Austria and co-financed by the European
Commission.
COGENERATION
Biomass-Fired Gas Turbine A current trend in industrialized
countries is the use of increasing number of smaller and more flexible biomass
based plants for cogeneration of heat and electricity. A newly developed biomass
cogeneration plant in Knoxville, Tennessee, USA, is at the cutting edge of one
of the promising technologies behind this development. The plant combines a wood
furnace with a gas turbine. A hot, pressurized flue-gas filter cleans the
exhaust gas from the furnace before it drives the power turbine. The plant can
run on fresh cut sawdust (40% humidity), and produces 5.8 MW of electricity,
while consuming 10 tons sawdust/hour, and delivering heat as hot exhaust gas at
370°C. This gives an electric efficiency of about 19% and overall efficiency of
up to about 75%. The exhaust gas can be used in a steam turbine, increasing
electric output to 9.6 MW, and electricity efficiency to over 30%. The plant in
Knoxville has been operating since spring 1999.
© Copyright energysavingnow.com 2000.
© Copyrights to Software @ this site
|